Japanese writer Rie Kudan acknowledged that ChatGPT, an uncommon source of assistance, had helped her win one of the nation’s most important literary honors.
ChatGPT Drives Literary Triumph: Rie Kudan Takes Home the Akutagawa Award
The 33-year-old Rie Kudan, who on Wednesday received the Akutagawa Prize for the finest work of fiction by a promising new writer, stated, “I plan to continue to profit from the use of AI in the writing of my novels while letting my creativity express itself to the fullest.” At a press conference, the author subsequently revealed that roughly 5% of her work “The Tokyo Tower of Sympathy,” which committee members praised as “practically flawless,” was created entirely by artificial intelligence.
Read More Articles :
The Kitchen on Netflix: An affecting, dystopian story of community
Where To Watch 2024 Golden Globes Winning Films
Princess Charlene Makes Her Glamorous 2024 Debut Alongside Her Spouse And Their Two Kids.
The issues confronted by an architect tasked with designing an opulent, skyscraper prison in Tokyo where criminals receive treatment for their offenses are the focus of this AI-themed story. In her personal life, Kudan claimed, she would talk to ChatGPT about issues she felt uncomfortable sharing with others.
She said, “I sometimes reflected my feelings in the lines of the main character when the AI did not say what I expected.” At a time when many artists worry that technology is jeopardizing their capacity to make a living, the author is by no means the only artist to stir up controversy with artificial intelligence. The Sony World Photography Awards saw Berlin-based photographer Boris Eldagsen withdraw from the competition last year after disclosing that the technology was used to construct his winning creative shot entry.
AI’s Pen in Literary Achievement: 5% of ChatGPT’s Award-Winning Book
As for OpenAI, the firm that created ChatGPT, authors including George R. R. Martin, Jodi Picoult, and John Grisham joined a class action lawsuit against it last year, claiming that it exploited copyrighted content while training its systems to produce more human-like responses.
Additionally, an open letter signed by over 10,000 authors, including Margaret Atwood, Roxane Gay, and James Patterson, urged AI industry leaders to get authors’ permission before using their works to train huge language models and to pay them appropriately when they do.
Tokyo Sympathy Tower: AI-Powered Art ChatGPT That Simulates Life
Author and member of the prize committee Keiichiro Hirano said on X, the social media platform that was formerly known as Twitter, that Kudan’s use of artificial intelligence was not a concern for the selection committee.
The narrative that Rie Kudan’s highly acclaimed art was created with the aid of generative AI appears to be misconstrued. You will see that the work mentions generative AI if you read it,” the author wrote. “That type of usage will cause issues down the road, but Tokyo Sympathy Tower does not experience that.”
Nevertheless, On social media, some people praised Kudan for her inventive use of AI and claimed to be more intrigued by her writing. Others, on the other hand, referred to it as “disrespectful” to other writers who did not employ the technology.
The Creative Ghostwriter Debate: ChatGPT’s Involvement Revealed
According to The Times, the most recent winner of the Akutagawa Prize, one of Japan’s most important literary honors, has acknowledged using artificial intelligence (AI) to write some of her books. Novelist Rie Kudan said that she “made active use of generative AI like ChatGPT in writing this book” after accepting the award at a ceremony on Wednesday. “I would say about five percent of the book quoted verbatim the sentences generated by AI,” she stated.
Perhaps unintentionally, judges applauded Kudan’s piece, titled The Tokyo Tower of Sympathy, with one calling it “flawless.” However, given the ongoing discussion surrounding the application of generative AI in the arts, those judges may now feel deceived because a sizable chunk of the book was shockingly revealed to have been written by a chatbot.
Life Is Modelled by Art
In the alternate future depicted in Kudan’s book, artificial intelligence plays a major role in daily life. It centers on an architect who contributed to the construction of a luxurious jailhouse for criminals in Shinjuku, housed in a high-rise tower. According to News on Japan, Kudan examines her character’s unease about the acceptance of these criminals by society as well as the widespread use of generative AI.
Maybe she believed that using the same technology she used to compose the story was allowed by these pertinent notions, or maybe she was lying to make a point. Kudan clarified her goals during the award event, telling The Times that she wished to investigate how “soft and fuzzy words” may cloud our perceptions of fairness. “In recent years, we find ourselves in a situation in which words have expanded without limit, and permitted unlimited interpretations,” Kudan told The Times. “I want to use the words with care, and to think about the positive and negative aspects of language.”
Short Circuit Awards By ChatGPT
This is not the first time an allegedly AI-generated submission has won an award in the arts. A winner of the Sony World Photography Awards last year said that their purported “photo” was a fake created by artificial intelligence and that their act was intended to spark more discussion about the subject. As a result, the winner declined to take home the prize. The Colorado State Fair’s 2022 digital art prize winner, who also turned out to be AI-generated, was equally contentious.
The majority of the debate revolves around how these generative AI models were trained on a tonne of copyrighted material, not to mention possibly anything ever posted online, rather than the existential concerns the technology brings to artists. Incensed writers have been leading the way in the legal arena in that regard. Well-known authors John Grisham and George R.R. Martin have filed lawsuits against OpenAI for using their works as training material for ChatGPT without their consent or payment.
The verdicts in these cases could have a significant impact on the technology’s viability both legally and financially. However, prizes such as these will remain arenas of conflict for the acceptance of AI in the art world for the time being.
